Surprisingly, after two weeks we had finally learned to be on time. We made Matt’s day who didn’t miss Galen though. Our first speaker of the day was Veronica Eady who spoke the American fellows’ mind. She talked about Environmental Justice with focus on NYC. It was the first time we mentioned important environmental issues. The Europeans learned that environmental justice is not just an international problem of multinationals shipping off their waste to India, but of building schools on toxic grounds in the impoverished areas of NYC. Environmental justice in the US focuses mainly around the discrimination of race. The movement started in the 1980s growing out of the Civil Rights Movement. But even today, the battle has not finished yet. The New York Layers for the Public Interest (NYLPI) support communities in fighting against waste facilities in poor neighborhoods and for cleaning up contaminated soil. Even though Veronica tries hard she has not managed yet to make the Americans aware of the threatening environmental problems and to stop them from consuming too much.
Veronica’s colleges Cynthia Soohoo and Marianne Engelman-Lado working on the Campaign to Restore Civil Rights talked about the recent development in American courts and the drawbacks for human rights. According to our guests, the Supreme Court has interpreted the definition of discrimination very narrowly, which makes it very hard to prove discrimination in court. Moreover, individual states cannot be held responsible for civil rights violations. Highly motivated, they explained how conservatives do not preserve anything but are a great force of change and therefore do not deserve the label. The right wing judges have created an enormous gap between domestic and international human rights law. The last hope for human rights advocates is to fill loose state definition by international interpretations. In addition to creative legal strategies, Cynthia and Marianne have dedicated themselves to explain 55% of the Americans about the three government branches.
Next we welcomed increasingly pregnant Elena Cabral who promised us that we would learn how to look straight into somebody’s eyes but still write down every word he says. Although we doubt our multitasking abilities we appreciated her journalistic expertise. We are now ready to go out there and after a short but polite introduction of 20 words get the most amazing quotes. So, we ask: “Who else can we talk to?”
Nobody is perfect but we don’t talk about our failures. Although we haven’t seen the movie “about Wings and Roots”, we believe that it is very impressive. We will confirm so on Wednesday.
Off we were to the greatest show in town: The finale at the international National Dance Institute, which we had visited to teach Jumpstyle last week. We were taken on an artistic journey from Bali, through Mexico to NYC’s street culture. Rolling eyes and vibrating hands enchanted the crowd but imitations failed. Yet, Balinese dance can’t go with ballet, nor with tap, but with Mary Kennedy’s hip hop as demonstrated by kicking and pulling movements. However, we were really impressed by the talents. As they enjoyed the dancing, we enjoyed the show.
Even though we still really love each other, that night we split and didn’t decide on a common activitiy. However, we are sure everyone enjoyed the free night.
Pawel, Shauna & Julia
Sunday, July 29, 2007
Evangelicals for HIA
We arrived bright in early at NYU on Monday, which trumped Packer with its comfortable chairs, air conditioning and free breakfast, not to mention its location right in the heart of the village (sorry Nick). The subject of the day was religiosity. We began with Randy Balmer, who defined evangelicalism for us:
1) The biblical text is taken literally and the text is seen as normative.
2) The concept of the conversion or experience in which one is “born again.”
3) The responsibility to evangelize or bring others into the fold.
We discussed how evangelism has become a force in politics, beginning (not, with Roe V. Wade) but with the election of Carter, a “born again Christian,” in the wake of the Nixon scandal. He also mentioned that as Churches grew that the three concepts of evangelism have been professionalized. Moreover, we discussed how evangelism has become a force for conservatism that has little basis in the three concepts. For example, we talked about how the movement that spearheaded some of the anti-slavery movements gained racist tendencies. We wondered to what extent the religious tenements really influenced the beliefs of the religious right. However, Balmer argued that the religious right is on the wane.
Next up was John Washburn. He spoke mostly about co-opting the support of evangelicals for the International Criminal Court.
Peter Skerry was next up, after a quick lunch break where most of got Indian food. He spoke about Muslims in the US, speaking mostly about how the situation of Muslims has completely changed since 9/11. We talked about Muslim American identity, and the prejudices of the American public.
Finally, we ended with Bill Eskridge, whose southern eloquence kept us all awake at 4:30 in the afternoon. Behind him he drew a detailed picture of the united states split into three regions (see below)
Region 1 was called the “benign” region, meaning that gays and lesbians are mostly accepted into society. In these states there are anti-discrimination laws, and in some cases same-sex marriage.
Region 2, are the “tolerable” states. They often tolerate gays and lesbians but they will not extend rights like marriage.
Finally, region 3 hold the opinion that gays and lesbians are “malignant,” they are the most likely to have statutes and regulations explicitly discriminating against gays and lesbians.
We talked about “no-promo-homo” laws, which are laws that discriminate against LGBT individuals. And we also talked about the historical progression that Eskridge sees.
Privacy Rights (such as sodomy laws) -> Anti-Discrimination laws -> Relations Laws
Since Lawrence V. Texas anti-sodomy laws have been struck down. The next step in Eskridge’s view is to push for anti-discrimination laws in the workplace. He feels that they are both achievable, important and palatable to the public. By allowing more gays and lesbians to feel comfortable in the workplace, they can pave the way for future rights.
Later that evening a few of us explored some of NYC’s best restaurants through restaurant week, yum.
(Kayla, Jendrek, Jason, Katharina)
Friday, July 27: We've got some questions?
On Friday morning, we returned to the debate over public education in New York City--a debate that is already controversial in this city, but might be even moreso within our group. Even the three of us find ourselves mired in debate over charter schools.
Here are some of the major questions that we have about charter schools: What policy reforms will Joel Klein, Chancellor of NYC Public Schools, and the City implement in public schools? Are charter schools permanant institutions in public education, or are they temporary stages in a broader, more equitable, public education reform? If competition and accountability are two of the most oft-spoken flashwords for charter school advocates, who is able to access information about charter schools and about public school performance? Does competition not always end in inequality? What are the implications of accepting inequality of educational opportunity, when we also speak about an equal right to equal education? Despite the differences in our opinions, we think that in general, we all share concern for the looming question, what is happening, and what will happen, to non-charter public schools? Similarly, most, if not all of us, have a strong concern for any for-profit charter schools because of the incontrovertible proof that private concerns inevitibly come into conflict with public goods and equality. Furthermore, every critic of public education has mentioned the teachers' union, but we have not had a chance to actually listen to anyone from the union. Critics of the union seem to have very legitimate concerns, but we just need to learn more about the union's own arguments.
We had the opportunity to listen to Mimi Corcoran (former executive director of the Beginning with Children Foundation, Inc.) and Ejim Dike (Right to Education Project) at the International Center for Tolerance Education. We joined high schools students who are also on fellowships at the Human Rights Summer Institute, hosted by the ICTE. HiA fellows will be mentoring the HRSI fellows on education topics over the next week, as the prepare for debate over school vouchers, charter schools, and No Child Left Behind.
In the afternoon, we had a visit from Shari Turitz from the Synergos Institute, about philanthropy along the Mexico-U.S. Border. Because of the fact that many of us had enormous double-bacon cheeseburgers from Five Guys in Brooklyn (especially Sean and Thomas), the post-lunch digestion lull really hit hard. But the role of the private sector in social change has been a repeated theme this summer, and our next speaker, Linda Rottenburg, raised this issue to the fore. Linda is the CEO and founder of Endeavor, a non-profit organization that provides business assistance to entrepreneurs in emerging economies.
Again, Linda's project raised some crucial questions for us, without many answers. For example, Linda told us about two Argentinian entrepreneurs who began an office supply company from scratch. Their company grew successfully--then, Staples bought it out, and one of the two founders is the regional manager of Staples in Latin America. Doesn't this simply allow U.S. corporations to save themselves from the risks of investing in emerging economies until people from these countries have grown their own successful businesses? Second, is this another "trickle-down" economic model of deveopment? That is, will producing another "crop" of successful business people in emerging economies actually benefit the poor? Alternatively, how can you help the poor without a strong economy? If Endeavor is really advancing progressive social goods, why does it happen that so many huge corporate CEOs are so interested in and excited about their work? Many progressives have a knee-jerk reaction to nearly anything from the private sector, but how can we engage in and with the private for progressive politics?
Again, many of us are undecided on the project of Endeavor. But we also see the good of, sometimes, "ending" with some questions. We are also asking questions about where our own perspectives and opinions come from. What historical, cultural, political, and economic conditions have given rise to our own perspectives? It is without a doubt that part of what has made our discussions so vibrant thus far is because of the wide range of diversity of our backgrounds.
At night, to ease our differences, we played a game of "Uno." (Thomas made the incredibly poor joke of a title, "Unoversal.") However, we quickly discovered that there are different ways of playing this game, which quickly devolved into disputes over the rules, and, ultimately, hilarity.
Love,
Soraya, Doreen, Thomas
Here are some of the major questions that we have about charter schools: What policy reforms will Joel Klein, Chancellor of NYC Public Schools, and the City implement in public schools? Are charter schools permanant institutions in public education, or are they temporary stages in a broader, more equitable, public education reform? If competition and accountability are two of the most oft-spoken flashwords for charter school advocates, who is able to access information about charter schools and about public school performance? Does competition not always end in inequality? What are the implications of accepting inequality of educational opportunity, when we also speak about an equal right to equal education? Despite the differences in our opinions, we think that in general, we all share concern for the looming question, what is happening, and what will happen, to non-charter public schools? Similarly, most, if not all of us, have a strong concern for any for-profit charter schools because of the incontrovertible proof that private concerns inevitibly come into conflict with public goods and equality. Furthermore, every critic of public education has mentioned the teachers' union, but we have not had a chance to actually listen to anyone from the union. Critics of the union seem to have very legitimate concerns, but we just need to learn more about the union's own arguments.
We had the opportunity to listen to Mimi Corcoran (former executive director of the Beginning with Children Foundation, Inc.) and Ejim Dike (Right to Education Project) at the International Center for Tolerance Education. We joined high schools students who are also on fellowships at the Human Rights Summer Institute, hosted by the ICTE. HiA fellows will be mentoring the HRSI fellows on education topics over the next week, as the prepare for debate over school vouchers, charter schools, and No Child Left Behind.
In the afternoon, we had a visit from Shari Turitz from the Synergos Institute, about philanthropy along the Mexico-U.S. Border. Because of the fact that many of us had enormous double-bacon cheeseburgers from Five Guys in Brooklyn (especially Sean and Thomas), the post-lunch digestion lull really hit hard. But the role of the private sector in social change has been a repeated theme this summer, and our next speaker, Linda Rottenburg, raised this issue to the fore. Linda is the CEO and founder of Endeavor, a non-profit organization that provides business assistance to entrepreneurs in emerging economies.
Again, Linda's project raised some crucial questions for us, without many answers. For example, Linda told us about two Argentinian entrepreneurs who began an office supply company from scratch. Their company grew successfully--then, Staples bought it out, and one of the two founders is the regional manager of Staples in Latin America. Doesn't this simply allow U.S. corporations to save themselves from the risks of investing in emerging economies until people from these countries have grown their own successful businesses? Second, is this another "trickle-down" economic model of deveopment? That is, will producing another "crop" of successful business people in emerging economies actually benefit the poor? Alternatively, how can you help the poor without a strong economy? If Endeavor is really advancing progressive social goods, why does it happen that so many huge corporate CEOs are so interested in and excited about their work? Many progressives have a knee-jerk reaction to nearly anything from the private sector, but how can we engage in and with the private for progressive politics?
Again, many of us are undecided on the project of Endeavor. But we also see the good of, sometimes, "ending" with some questions. We are also asking questions about where our own perspectives and opinions come from. What historical, cultural, political, and economic conditions have given rise to our own perspectives? It is without a doubt that part of what has made our discussions so vibrant thus far is because of the wide range of diversity of our backgrounds.
At night, to ease our differences, we played a game of "Uno." (Thomas made the incredibly poor joke of a title, "Unoversal.") However, we quickly discovered that there are different ways of playing this game, which quickly devolved into disputes over the rules, and, ultimately, hilarity.
Love,
Soraya, Doreen, Thomas
Wednesday, July 25, 2007
Thursday, 7/19/2007
Today we left for Brooklyn in a rather different way than we normally
do, namely over the water. Although we had to wait for 30 minutes for
our boat to arrive, it was a worthwhile experience as we got to see
the skyline of the financial district from the top of the water taxi.
When we arrived back on the mainland we rushed over to the subway as
we were very late. After an interesting detour along the highway of
red hook, we were finally picked up by Matt who gave us correct
directions to the Red Hook Community Justice Center. The justice
center, an initiative from the an organization called court innovation
(www.courtinnovation.org), has had a major positive influence on the
highly criminalized community of Red Hook. Combining a criminal,
family and housing court the community justice center seeks to find
solutions for the many problems which used to be invested in the
community of red hook. Rather than punishing offenders of low level
crimes through incarceration, red hook tries to look at the underlying
problems which motivate many of the recurring criminal offenders. The
center has a clinic, social workers and offers legal aid to the
defendants, through which it tries to address the root of the
problems. After watching several hearings, many of us were highly
impressed by this almost 'commonsensical' alternative to the American
obsession with incarceration.
The wonderful wonderful thing that day of course was Herbert Sturz,
whom we met at his Vera Institute of Justice (www.vera.org). He
founded this institute together with Louis Schweitzer in 1961, soon
working with New York Citys government to improve the situation of
people in pretrial detention. Vera moved on, soon working on minority
rights with the Kennedys. The Vera website doesn't say so, just like
it is quite sure that Herbert Sturz concealed many more things. He is
such a humble person, despite having built more than 250 000 houses
for the poor of South Africa, despite Vera being involved with
virtually everything, from court system to housing to evaluating a
police in many countries all around the world. Many of our questions
for him began with "There seems to be a big problem with ..." and
ended with "Has the Vera institute been involved in something to solve
this?" Mr. Sturz answer always was 'yes'. Actually Nina constantly had
a big smile on her face listening to this elderly man who was
predestined to form to a mentor and inspiration in our heads.
do, namely over the water. Although we had to wait for 30 minutes for
our boat to arrive, it was a worthwhile experience as we got to see
the skyline of the financial district from the top of the water taxi.
When we arrived back on the mainland we rushed over to the subway as
we were very late. After an interesting detour along the highway of
red hook, we were finally picked up by Matt who gave us correct
directions to the Red Hook Community Justice Center. The justice
center, an initiative from the an organization called court innovation
(www.courtinnovation.org), has had a major positive influence on the
highly criminalized community of Red Hook. Combining a criminal,
family and housing court the community justice center seeks to find
solutions for the many problems which used to be invested in the
community of red hook. Rather than punishing offenders of low level
crimes through incarceration, red hook tries to look at the underlying
problems which motivate many of the recurring criminal offenders. The
center has a clinic, social workers and offers legal aid to the
defendants, through which it tries to address the root of the
problems. After watching several hearings, many of us were highly
impressed by this almost 'commonsensical' alternative to the American
obsession with incarceration.
The wonderful wonderful thing that day of course was Herbert Sturz,
whom we met at his Vera Institute of Justice (www.vera.org). He
founded this institute together with Louis Schweitzer in 1961, soon
working with New York Citys government to improve the situation of
people in pretrial detention. Vera moved on, soon working on minority
rights with the Kennedys. The Vera website doesn't say so, just like
it is quite sure that Herbert Sturz concealed many more things. He is
such a humble person, despite having built more than 250 000 houses
for the poor of South Africa, despite Vera being involved with
virtually everything, from court system to housing to evaluating a
police in many countries all around the world. Many of our questions
for him began with "There seems to be a big problem with ..." and
ended with "Has the Vera institute been involved in something to solve
this?" Mr. Sturz answer always was 'yes'. Actually Nina constantly had
a big smile on her face listening to this elderly man who was
predestined to form to a mentor and inspiration in our heads.
Wednesday, July 18, 2007
A Beautiful Mess
Today, we were awoken by the raw power of a New York thunderstorm. We ended our day at Packer with lightning in the air.
Our first speaker of the day was lefty journalist Kai Wright, whose lecture on health and race focused on the issue of mortality in the black community. Wright’s lecture shook the group’s foundations by raising previously taboo subjects such as sex and drugs (though not rock and roll). After receiving instructions yesterday not to flirt, Wright’s talk added the combination of warmth and electricity that our group was sorely missing.
Wright’s honesty about his ideological leanings was refreshing, and his lecture sparked a passionate discussion about how we conceptualize choice in America. Wright questioned how conservatives have framed the issue of HIV/AIDS, arguing that the choices we make are a product of our circumstances. For example, prisoner’s decisions about sex, drug use, and tattoos are limited by prisons’ regulations regarding clean needles, condoms, and tattoos materials.
After Wright’s talk, we engaged in a discussion about discussion. Specifically, our discussion discussed the important (and sometimes undiscussable) discussion regarding the discussion of minority issues in America, and how they should be discussed. After a stormy discussion, we decided on a policy of two-finger raising. While we thought the storm had passed, we were in merely in the eye of the hurricane.
After our discussion, we watched Edward R. Murrow’s (of Good Night and Good Luck fame) Harvest of Shame (1960). Many were impressed both by Murrrow’s ever-present cigarette, as well as his willingness to cross journalistic boundaries to seek the truth. The film broke down racial boundaries, and was uniquely able to express the most compelling details of migrant workers’ personal narratives. While the group was disappointed that Aristide Zolberg decided to come in June, even without him we were able to have a good discussion about labor unions in the United States.
Our night ended with a social function at the home of Judith Goldstein. The wheels of the Humanity in Action machine were well oiled with gin and tonics, Carlsberg, wine, and Vodka. Alix viewed a video about Berlin, and decided her future was to spend her old age smoking cigarettes in this city with Edward R. Murrow.
Our night was further complicated by a steam explosion in New York City. One person was killed, but luckily, it was not a member of our group. While the alcohol improved the group’s function, our return home was quite dysfunctional. Due to a steam explosion near Grand Central Station, our travel arrangements home from Judy’s party were complicated, forcing many of us to take a taxi home.
July 18th was a day of mourning and explosions, from start to finish.
-Alix, Asia, Sean
Our first speaker of the day was lefty journalist Kai Wright, whose lecture on health and race focused on the issue of mortality in the black community. Wright’s lecture shook the group’s foundations by raising previously taboo subjects such as sex and drugs (though not rock and roll). After receiving instructions yesterday not to flirt, Wright’s talk added the combination of warmth and electricity that our group was sorely missing.
Wright’s honesty about his ideological leanings was refreshing, and his lecture sparked a passionate discussion about how we conceptualize choice in America. Wright questioned how conservatives have framed the issue of HIV/AIDS, arguing that the choices we make are a product of our circumstances. For example, prisoner’s decisions about sex, drug use, and tattoos are limited by prisons’ regulations regarding clean needles, condoms, and tattoos materials.
After Wright’s talk, we engaged in a discussion about discussion. Specifically, our discussion discussed the important (and sometimes undiscussable) discussion regarding the discussion of minority issues in America, and how they should be discussed. After a stormy discussion, we decided on a policy of two-finger raising. While we thought the storm had passed, we were in merely in the eye of the hurricane.
After our discussion, we watched Edward R. Murrow’s (of Good Night and Good Luck fame) Harvest of Shame (1960). Many were impressed both by Murrrow’s ever-present cigarette, as well as his willingness to cross journalistic boundaries to seek the truth. The film broke down racial boundaries, and was uniquely able to express the most compelling details of migrant workers’ personal narratives. While the group was disappointed that Aristide Zolberg decided to come in June, even without him we were able to have a good discussion about labor unions in the United States.
Our night ended with a social function at the home of Judith Goldstein. The wheels of the Humanity in Action machine were well oiled with gin and tonics, Carlsberg, wine, and Vodka. Alix viewed a video about Berlin, and decided her future was to spend her old age smoking cigarettes in this city with Edward R. Murrow.
Our night was further complicated by a steam explosion in New York City. One person was killed, but luckily, it was not a member of our group. While the alcohol improved the group’s function, our return home was quite dysfunctional. Due to a steam explosion near Grand Central Station, our travel arrangements home from Judy’s party were complicated, forcing many of us to take a taxi home.
July 18th was a day of mourning and explosions, from start to finish.
-Alix, Asia, Sean
Tuesday, July 17, 2007
Not LL Cool J, BUT......Neal!
This morning we stretched our legs uptown to Harlem as we recovered from a fiercely competitive, yet much needed, late-night soccer match. (The French were especially fierce, but no head-butts were reported. Soraya may have hit someone, but not with her head.) Strolling down the historic Malcolm X/Lenox Blvd, we peered into the window of a brand new apartment building that boasted advertisements for new apartments at "The Langston." "Join the Renaissance!" "Real homes for real New Yorkers," the sign reads, below a picture of two white parents, cradling their child, thoughts of Wall Street stirring their pocketbooks for the "steal" of an apartment in Manhattan for a mere $600,000. This is the reality of development in Harlem: Bill Clinton's offices, a new trendy "W" hotel, double-decker tour buses, and new apartment buildings surge uptown, eager to buy up Harlem's historic names and heritage and slap them on their advertisements, while many black people face a stark reality of sharp rent increases and high-priced lifestyles they cannot afford.
Neal Shoemaker is President of Harlem Heritage Tours, an alternative, community-based tour company he founded by accident several years ago. While taking us around historic sites such as the Apollo Theater, Hotel Theresa, and a statue of Adam Clayton Powell, Jr., he also brought us by his friends' hot dog and refreshment carts, waived and hollered at his neighbors, and poked fun at the tour buses that gave people a colonialist's gaze of his streets. Neal gave us a good sense of the issues that Harlem is facing: that the profits of economic "development" rarely stay in Harlem; that people are being forced out of their own homes, neighborhoods and histories; new charter schools that seem to provide some success for youths; a fractured black community failing to negotiate class divisions; and the growing urgency for community organization. Neal provided us with a lively, hilarious, and very human view into the neighborhood he, his parents, and his grandparents lived in, as well as a powerful voice for local tourism and its potential impacts for beneficial social change. Even as he expressed alarm at the changes in Harlem, Neal mixed charm, a small mustache, and some fine dance moves with his social commentary, reflecting a strong tradition among black Americans for bringing the light together with the heavy.
Our toes slapped Malcolm X Blvd to the impressive Schomburg Centre (http://www.nypl.org/research/sc/sc.html) , the most comprehensive collection of historical texts and documents on the cultures of the African diaspora in existence. As we viewed historical charicatures and stereotypes of black Americans, as well as a countering section of positive attempts at self-representation, we discussed contemporary representations that reflect the continuities of history. German stores still sell chocolate bars with an dark-skinned orientalist figure on the wrapper and France continues to drink Banania, a chocolate drink with a "big-lipped" black smile on the box. Many French and Germans ask for "nigger heads," chocolate-covered cream desserts served in bakeries. Colleges and universities in the U.S. have recently had several "blackface" incidents, in which white students painted their bodies and faces black. The colonialist roots of these representations somehow still echo in contemporary pop and consumerist culture.
After enormous portions of mouth-watering soul food at the world famous Sylvia's restaurant, we hit the subway downtown to Brooklyn. On the train, we reflected (quite seriously) on alternative ways of introducing a girlfriend or boyfriend. Partner? Signifiant other? Lover? A wink and a smile? Gregor made the incisive suggestion: "What about teammate?" We believe that we have come by successful progress in this endeavor.
Following this enlightening discussion, we met documentary film-maker Shola Lynch. After producing the award-winning Chisholm '72, about Shirley Chisolm, the determined and idealistic black woman to run for the presidency (people think it is a big deal that Hillary and Barak are running today!), she produced a short series on prisons for CNN. We could write pages about the plight of black Americans with regards to the prison system in the U.S.--their incredible overrepresentation, the private corporations reaping millions from government contracts to build more and more prisons, the racist outcomes of enforcing "tough on crime" laws, mandatory minimums and the "war on drugs," the disenfranchisement of the right to vote for thousands of black Americans who are convicted of felonies; prison labor, the cost to tax-payers, and the costs to prisoners' families. There is something incredibly insidious about the culmination of forces that allow some to profit off the violent regulation and management of very specific populations and there is something pernicious about American society's neglect for the very real needs of people living in poverty and people who cannot enter the society to which they have already paid debt. We are daunted by how deeply embedded punishment has been woven into this society, and are more than concerned at the recent spread of similar approaches to crime, poverty and the "integration" of racial minorities in France, Britain, and other countries.
After Doreen bought two raspberry coffees (she HATES raspberries!) from a deceptive street vendor, we moved on with heavy and tired shoes to the Rotunda Art Gallery in Brooklyn for the opening of an exhibit by artist and teacher Duron Jackson. He spoke eloquently about the effects of our prison system on his brother's life and is attempting to deal with the troubling 10-year sentence of a 17 year-old black high school student named Genarlow Wilson, from Atlanta, for consensual oral sex with a 15 year-old girl. We also learned about the difficulties of conveying the complexities and depth of our thoughts through creativity. Our group had mixed reactions to the exhibit, which consisted of a decentered black print of a naked body on a white page, a large picture of Genarlow, an abstract aerial view of a prison, and the thick smell of grass and dirt on the ground.
We are struggling to connect these events as well as the myriad other speakers and visits we have had the privilege to engage. But we do have questions about the relations between these issues. What are the relations between representations of black Americans and other minorities and such extraordinary incarceration and recivisim rates? What can we glean from Neal's wit, strength, and smile? How do we respond to systematic disenfranchisement and deprivation of minorities through creativity and thoughtfulness? Perhaps we can work through these questions in the alleged debreifing session tomorrow...
Soraya, Doreen, and Thomas
Neal Shoemaker is President of Harlem Heritage Tours, an alternative, community-based tour company he founded by accident several years ago. While taking us around historic sites such as the Apollo Theater, Hotel Theresa, and a statue of Adam Clayton Powell, Jr., he also brought us by his friends' hot dog and refreshment carts, waived and hollered at his neighbors, and poked fun at the tour buses that gave people a colonialist's gaze of his streets. Neal gave us a good sense of the issues that Harlem is facing: that the profits of economic "development" rarely stay in Harlem; that people are being forced out of their own homes, neighborhoods and histories; new charter schools that seem to provide some success for youths; a fractured black community failing to negotiate class divisions; and the growing urgency for community organization. Neal provided us with a lively, hilarious, and very human view into the neighborhood he, his parents, and his grandparents lived in, as well as a powerful voice for local tourism and its potential impacts for beneficial social change. Even as he expressed alarm at the changes in Harlem, Neal mixed charm, a small mustache, and some fine dance moves with his social commentary, reflecting a strong tradition among black Americans for bringing the light together with the heavy.
Our toes slapped Malcolm X Blvd to the impressive Schomburg Centre (http://www.nypl.org/research/sc/sc.html) , the most comprehensive collection of historical texts and documents on the cultures of the African diaspora in existence. As we viewed historical charicatures and stereotypes of black Americans, as well as a countering section of positive attempts at self-representation, we discussed contemporary representations that reflect the continuities of history. German stores still sell chocolate bars with an dark-skinned orientalist figure on the wrapper and France continues to drink Banania, a chocolate drink with a "big-lipped" black smile on the box. Many French and Germans ask for "nigger heads," chocolate-covered cream desserts served in bakeries. Colleges and universities in the U.S. have recently had several "blackface" incidents, in which white students painted their bodies and faces black. The colonialist roots of these representations somehow still echo in contemporary pop and consumerist culture.
After enormous portions of mouth-watering soul food at the world famous Sylvia's restaurant, we hit the subway downtown to Brooklyn. On the train, we reflected (quite seriously) on alternative ways of introducing a girlfriend or boyfriend. Partner? Signifiant other? Lover? A wink and a smile? Gregor made the incisive suggestion: "What about teammate?" We believe that we have come by successful progress in this endeavor.
Following this enlightening discussion, we met documentary film-maker Shola Lynch. After producing the award-winning Chisholm '72, about Shirley Chisolm, the determined and idealistic black woman to run for the presidency (people think it is a big deal that Hillary and Barak are running today!), she produced a short series on prisons for CNN. We could write pages about the plight of black Americans with regards to the prison system in the U.S.--their incredible overrepresentation, the private corporations reaping millions from government contracts to build more and more prisons, the racist outcomes of enforcing "tough on crime" laws, mandatory minimums and the "war on drugs," the disenfranchisement of the right to vote for thousands of black Americans who are convicted of felonies; prison labor, the cost to tax-payers, and the costs to prisoners' families. There is something incredibly insidious about the culmination of forces that allow some to profit off the violent regulation and management of very specific populations and there is something pernicious about American society's neglect for the very real needs of people living in poverty and people who cannot enter the society to which they have already paid debt. We are daunted by how deeply embedded punishment has been woven into this society, and are more than concerned at the recent spread of similar approaches to crime, poverty and the "integration" of racial minorities in France, Britain, and other countries.
After Doreen bought two raspberry coffees (she HATES raspberries!) from a deceptive street vendor, we moved on with heavy and tired shoes to the Rotunda Art Gallery in Brooklyn for the opening of an exhibit by artist and teacher Duron Jackson. He spoke eloquently about the effects of our prison system on his brother's life and is attempting to deal with the troubling 10-year sentence of a 17 year-old black high school student named Genarlow Wilson, from Atlanta, for consensual oral sex with a 15 year-old girl. We also learned about the difficulties of conveying the complexities and depth of our thoughts through creativity. Our group had mixed reactions to the exhibit, which consisted of a decentered black print of a naked body on a white page, a large picture of Genarlow, an abstract aerial view of a prison, and the thick smell of grass and dirt on the ground.
We are struggling to connect these events as well as the myriad other speakers and visits we have had the privilege to engage. But we do have questions about the relations between these issues. What are the relations between representations of black Americans and other minorities and such extraordinary incarceration and recivisim rates? What can we glean from Neal's wit, strength, and smile? How do we respond to systematic disenfranchisement and deprivation of minorities through creativity and thoughtfulness? Perhaps we can work through these questions in the alleged debreifing session tomorrow...
Soraya, Doreen, and Thomas
Monday, July 16: Get Up and Jumpstyle!
Starting the second week of the HiA program, we were joined by the First Achievement Teacher Fellows. First Achievement runs highly recognized charter schools and has succeeded in providing good education to underprivileged children in New York City. Charter schools promote greater independency from the district board of education. We enjoyed having the teacher fellows and their insights into the education and appreciated their critical questions.
After finding out about the new faces in our already beloved Packer Room, our first speaker had made his way through the jungle of New York’s public transport. As a double Pulitzer Prize winner David Levering Lewis challenged our concentration and linguistic skills with his highly sophisticated speech on the Civil Rights Movement and its Legacy. In his critical view of American politics and society the idea of diversity has not yet succeeded in solving all the problems. He surprised especially the Europeans that some Americans do believe that state action can do good. We mean, if we understood correctly.
As a second speaker, we welcomed the celebrity Joel Klein and his bodyguard. After a career in law, government and business Joel Klein is now New York City schools chancellor. Talking about Education Reform in Public Schools he explained his magic formula a (ccountability) + e (mpowerment) + c (ompetition) = r (esults). He continued to emphasize: “Education has to serve the needs of the kids”. However, the German delegation was extremely skeptical if the American corporate economic model would indeed serve the “consumers”. Despite the criticism, we think it is remarkable that graduation rate increased from 30,000 to 38,000 students in the past five years. This number includes a lot of Afro-American and Hispanic students.
After a very relaxing and delicious MTAsubway lunch we found ourselves at the National Dance Institute on the West Side. Unlike the rest of the days, children who are living up to our HiA mission inspired us through their passionate body language and thrilling moves. We watched the famous and award winning Jacques d’ Amboise putting together a performance of HipHop and Bali dance with students from around the US and Bali. To see them communicate through music was very moving, so were the conversations with budding artists. After shy attempts to define HiA, Koen spoke their language with eloquent Jumpstyle dancing from The Netherlands. We all got up and participated. Now we hope that Mexican sun dance will be mixed with Dutch moves.
To not make us feel not too untalented, Judy thoughtfully treated us with ice cream. We needed the sugar high to keep us quiet during the Danish presentation on free speech. We learned about lacking laws against racism, the meaning of free speech in Denmark and the cartoon crisis. The final event of the day was an introduction of the research projects by Matt.
We hope the soccer game went well. Other than minor injuries like bruises, we are happy to announce that none of our teammates is severely injured. We are looking forward to the upcoming days.
Shauna, Pawel, Julia
After finding out about the new faces in our already beloved Packer Room, our first speaker had made his way through the jungle of New York’s public transport. As a double Pulitzer Prize winner David Levering Lewis challenged our concentration and linguistic skills with his highly sophisticated speech on the Civil Rights Movement and its Legacy. In his critical view of American politics and society the idea of diversity has not yet succeeded in solving all the problems. He surprised especially the Europeans that some Americans do believe that state action can do good. We mean, if we understood correctly.
As a second speaker, we welcomed the celebrity Joel Klein and his bodyguard. After a career in law, government and business Joel Klein is now New York City schools chancellor. Talking about Education Reform in Public Schools he explained his magic formula a (ccountability) + e (mpowerment) + c (ompetition) = r (esults). He continued to emphasize: “Education has to serve the needs of the kids”. However, the German delegation was extremely skeptical if the American corporate economic model would indeed serve the “consumers”. Despite the criticism, we think it is remarkable that graduation rate increased from 30,000 to 38,000 students in the past five years. This number includes a lot of Afro-American and Hispanic students.
After a very relaxing and delicious MTAsubway lunch we found ourselves at the National Dance Institute on the West Side. Unlike the rest of the days, children who are living up to our HiA mission inspired us through their passionate body language and thrilling moves. We watched the famous and award winning Jacques d’ Amboise putting together a performance of HipHop and Bali dance with students from around the US and Bali. To see them communicate through music was very moving, so were the conversations with budding artists. After shy attempts to define HiA, Koen spoke their language with eloquent Jumpstyle dancing from The Netherlands. We all got up and participated. Now we hope that Mexican sun dance will be mixed with Dutch moves.
To not make us feel not too untalented, Judy thoughtfully treated us with ice cream. We needed the sugar high to keep us quiet during the Danish presentation on free speech. We learned about lacking laws against racism, the meaning of free speech in Denmark and the cartoon crisis. The final event of the day was an introduction of the research projects by Matt.
We hope the soccer game went well. Other than minor injuries like bruises, we are happy to announce that none of our teammates is severely injured. We are looking forward to the upcoming days.
Shauna, Pawel, Julia
Monday, July 16, 2007
LL-Cool-J rocking Allen Church - Amen!
After an uncontrolled outburst of energy and intake of alcohol at Nick’s place on Saturday, everybody was a bit exhausted going to church on Sunday (but apparently some people had to cleanse their sins). But after a long subway ride, during which almost everybody took a nap, we safely arrived at the church.
Even though the group was composed of Muslims, Jews, Christians, Agnostics, Atheists and given the lamentable state we were all in, we were pleasantly awakened by the sound of Gospel music. Compared to the sometimes solemn European service, most people were surprised by the sheer size of the modern cathedral and the number of energetic people in attendance. The music reminded Jakob of Prince and Louaay had flashbacks of R.Kelly’s hit: “I Believe I Can Fly”.
At the Allen Cathedral, going to church is much like attending a rock concert with choreographed dances, colourful choir robes, TV projections, and commercials. The group was very impressed by the talented musicians and vocalists. Even the most extreme atheists were touched by the exuberance.
There were frequent and fervent outbursts of “Amen!” and “Oh yeah!”, demonstrating active participation in the service. Attila was the only one of the group who exclaimed “Alleluia!!” when he saw LL Cool J entered the church through a side door. The congregation was encouraged to take notes from the sermon by an outline printed in the bulletin.
The European churches do not normally emphasise social ministry on the scale of the Allen Cathedral. The church facilitated a wide range of programs: school, supermarket, senior services and housing, etc. Reverend Flake also invited former convicts to participate in various church activities, including ministry to youth, as well as, sharing their stories of gang life and incarceration. This was a very controversial approach, however, Reverend Flake was convinced that this would help prevent gang recruitment in Jamaica Queens. He also placed a strong emphasis on collecting money and using it to empower the community through reinvestment.
Many of the HIA fellows invested in the community by donating blood after the service. However, some of their motives may or may not have been tainted. Jason later admitted that he partly donated to receive the free lunch. Other fellows bought-out a woman selling food from her van. Matt received a considerable discount on cake for his recruitment strategies (or for his irresistible charm).
Written by Halimatou, Naomi, Louaay and Jakob
AMEN!
Friday, July 13, 2007
Love Your Amygdala
Today our illustrious fellows finished their first week of Humanity in Action. Despite sleep deprivation, a still-tenuous understanding of New York City geography and, for some, wicked foot injuries via shoes poorly designed for walking, the fellows arrived at Brooklyn’s Packer Hall for a day of discussions and presentations on the subject of race.
We began the day with an introduction to German and Dutch experiences with racism and tolerance, respectively. We found out that Germans are more European than everybody else (sorry, I meant “Pro-European”) and that the Dutch are finally getting enough news coverage. On a more serious note, the two presentations showed the struggles European societies have had with racism and integration—not all that far from the American experiences we hear about from the speakers.
Also provocative was the PBS documentary “Faces of the Enemy”, which we watched and discussed in detail. The documentary discussed the depiction of the “enemy” object in propaganda materials as depicted, largely, by political cartoonists and government-contracted artists. From case to case, one becomes convinced that all “enemy” depictions, regardless of nationality or political approach, share similar feral qualities which render them inhuman and therefore “easier” to fight. After separating into small groups, we discussed the psychology behind these representations, the potency of these cartoon symbols and ways in which one might be able to resist these influences through reasoning and critical examinations. By the way, this group of bloggers is better than THAT group of bloggers.
In the afternoon, we realized that such group-identity is both explicitly and implicitly held view. We have since decided that we will put up a rotating screen saver with pictures of other bloggers to widen our perspective.
We left the presentation with an open question as to whether or not tolerance of the intolerant is a good thing, or is it just perpetuating the same kind of problems? Damian Stanley’s presentation offered optimistic details of how we can become more tolerant, but at the same time presented alarming statistics showing that while we have become less explicitly intolerant we are often just as implicitly intolerant. Is it progress if people still hold intolerant views (even if subconsciously), though they do not express them explicitly? Would we be better off if people raised their intolerances and better allowed us to address them?
The last presenter of the day was Hunter College’s own, professor Jessie Daniels. Dr. Daniels explored the imposing presence of hate groups on the internet. She also included an extensive presentation on cloaked websites. Cloaked websites are websites with a subversive message hidden behind a façade of wholesome intent and graphic design. Dr. Daniels focused her presentation primarily on white supremacist websites, about which more information can be found at her website http://jessiedanielsphd.com/.
And now for the weekend- and an entire day FREE. Take care of your amygdala!
(Katharina, Kayla, Jedrek, Jason)
We began the day with an introduction to German and Dutch experiences with racism and tolerance, respectively. We found out that Germans are more European than everybody else (sorry, I meant “Pro-European”) and that the Dutch are finally getting enough news coverage. On a more serious note, the two presentations showed the struggles European societies have had with racism and integration—not all that far from the American experiences we hear about from the speakers.
Also provocative was the PBS documentary “Faces of the Enemy”, which we watched and discussed in detail. The documentary discussed the depiction of the “enemy” object in propaganda materials as depicted, largely, by political cartoonists and government-contracted artists. From case to case, one becomes convinced that all “enemy” depictions, regardless of nationality or political approach, share similar feral qualities which render them inhuman and therefore “easier” to fight. After separating into small groups, we discussed the psychology behind these representations, the potency of these cartoon symbols and ways in which one might be able to resist these influences through reasoning and critical examinations. By the way, this group of bloggers is better than THAT group of bloggers.
In the afternoon, we realized that such group-identity is both explicitly and implicitly held view. We have since decided that we will put up a rotating screen saver with pictures of other bloggers to widen our perspective.
We left the presentation with an open question as to whether or not tolerance of the intolerant is a good thing, or is it just perpetuating the same kind of problems? Damian Stanley’s presentation offered optimistic details of how we can become more tolerant, but at the same time presented alarming statistics showing that while we have become less explicitly intolerant we are often just as implicitly intolerant. Is it progress if people still hold intolerant views (even if subconsciously), though they do not express them explicitly? Would we be better off if people raised their intolerances and better allowed us to address them?
The last presenter of the day was Hunter College’s own, professor Jessie Daniels. Dr. Daniels explored the imposing presence of hate groups on the internet. She also included an extensive presentation on cloaked websites. Cloaked websites are websites with a subversive message hidden behind a façade of wholesome intent and graphic design. Dr. Daniels focused her presentation primarily on white supremacist websites, about which more information can be found at her website http://jessiedanielsphd.com/.
And now for the weekend- and an entire day FREE. Take care of your amygdala!
(Katharina, Kayla, Jedrek, Jason)
Thursday, July 12, 2007
Asylees and Monsoons
Wednesday, July 11
The fellows snapped sprite and lively out of bed this morning (well, some), showered briskly and dressed to impress. Anders especially, as noted by Purnima, was adorned with a tie the likes of which have rarely been seen. It was time to head to the US Department of Justice Immigration Court to observe asylum hearings. Asylum is a legal status granted to foreigners who have entered the United States (in some cases illegally) under the condition that they prove a “well-founded fear” of persecution if they were to return to their country of origin. It is a process similar to that undergone by those seeking refugee status with the key difference that the individual has already entered the country and is asking to remain within its borders.
Due to confidentiality we can not mention individual cases, but generally asylum cases are based on the credibility of the defendant seeking asylum as determined by the sitting judge. An interesting factor in asylum cases is the wide discretion of the judge (which raised issues for many of the fellows because recent statistics have shown that some judges are much more liable to grant asylum than others). Many of the fellows found the experience to be incredibly impressionable. (Perhaps we have some future law students within the group?)
For lunch fellows went their separate ways (especially Purnima who somehow lost her monthly metro card in the process). Eventually we all wound up at Central Station at the headquarters of the International Rescue Committee, a group which assists refugees internationally to establish themselves in the United States. Their work is very admirable because they are a humanitarian group which effectively deals with many of the political and legal tangles encountered in the process of bringing refugees to the US.
Just before a widely anticipated pool party a monsoon swept through the streets of New York City. This put a damper on the festivities momentarily (although Galen, Thomas and Hollis thoroughly enjoyed skipping through puddles and jumping over the rivers running through the roads). Though the party had to be postponed and we were carried in different directions by the tides, we quickly regrouped and enjoyed learning more about each other over good 'ole American beers.
The fellows snapped sprite and lively out of bed this morning (well, some), showered briskly and dressed to impress. Anders especially, as noted by Purnima, was adorned with a tie the likes of which have rarely been seen. It was time to head to the US Department of Justice Immigration Court to observe asylum hearings. Asylum is a legal status granted to foreigners who have entered the United States (in some cases illegally) under the condition that they prove a “well-founded fear” of persecution if they were to return to their country of origin. It is a process similar to that undergone by those seeking refugee status with the key difference that the individual has already entered the country and is asking to remain within its borders.
Due to confidentiality we can not mention individual cases, but generally asylum cases are based on the credibility of the defendant seeking asylum as determined by the sitting judge. An interesting factor in asylum cases is the wide discretion of the judge (which raised issues for many of the fellows because recent statistics have shown that some judges are much more liable to grant asylum than others). Many of the fellows found the experience to be incredibly impressionable. (Perhaps we have some future law students within the group?)
For lunch fellows went their separate ways (especially Purnima who somehow lost her monthly metro card in the process). Eventually we all wound up at Central Station at the headquarters of the International Rescue Committee, a group which assists refugees internationally to establish themselves in the United States. Their work is very admirable because they are a humanitarian group which effectively deals with many of the political and legal tangles encountered in the process of bringing refugees to the US.
Just before a widely anticipated pool party a monsoon swept through the streets of New York City. This put a damper on the festivities momentarily (although Galen, Thomas and Hollis thoroughly enjoyed skipping through puddles and jumping over the rivers running through the roads). Though the party had to be postponed and we were carried in different directions by the tides, we quickly regrouped and enjoyed learning more about each other over good 'ole American beers.
Tuesday, July 10, 2007
Moving Jason
Jason today had to move his kitchen stuff from where he used to live near Columbia to the Hunter College dormitories. Which left us with a half-torn box with pans and dishes that had to be transported by subway and carried for about two to three miles.
Jason got a little slippery from sweat, me from the oil that covered the pans. Even New Yorkers where a little confused about what was going on, especially when I began offering them Jasons utensils for one Dollar a piece. No one bought anything, though. What Jason doesn't know up to now is that his pan actually was so heavy that I just left it in the train. But I scratched his name into it, so maybe he can get it back...
Ingmar
Jason got a little slippery from sweat, me from the oil that covered the pans. Even New Yorkers where a little confused about what was going on, especially when I began offering them Jasons utensils for one Dollar a piece. No one bought anything, though. What Jason doesn't know up to now is that his pan actually was so heavy that I just left it in the train. But I scratched his name into it, so maybe he can get it back...
Ingmar
Four speakers in one day!
Today was our second day of program and the first day of getting there by ourselves. Peter Schuck, professor at Yale Law School, opened the day with his talk on "managing diversity in America." By pointing to several aspects of American society, he showed how America is quite unique managing and regulating diversity. Among these aspects were separation of powers, federalism, and civil rights law. Many of us raised questions about the role and value of affirmative action in diversity. Talking about diversity in America naturally incorporated discussions of immigration and American values of individualism.
Our next speaker Arthur Brooks gave us a lively presentation on the joys of "giving." Brooks draws a connection between giving money and financial and personal well-being. Brooks with a background in behavioral economics provided statistical evidence giving will NOT make you poor. (For every dollar you give you will get $3.75 back) Scientific studies of the brain proves that the act of giving releases chemicals that make you feel good. Fellows questioned the extent of his claims and argued that he does not discuss the role of taxes as a contributor of social welfare such as common in most European countries.
After a short five minute break Burt Neuborne, a law professor of New York University, gave a passionate lecture on the American constitutional tradition. What followed was a two hour condensed law school education on American constitutional tradition. Neuborne said, "Add a little water to what I said and you can save three years of going to law school."
Dalton Conley concluded the day with a talk on "race, assets and the American dream." Conley highlighted major discrepancies between African American and whites in housing, assets, and education. He made an important distinction between wealth and income. Wealth of the parents is a predictor of education, unemployment rates, wealth of the children, while income is not a predictor at all. He stressed the importance of disadvantaged ethnic people becoming home owners which would contribute to their building of assets.
Nina, Diana and Ingmar
Our next speaker Arthur Brooks gave us a lively presentation on the joys of "giving." Brooks draws a connection between giving money and financial and personal well-being. Brooks with a background in behavioral economics provided statistical evidence giving will NOT make you poor. (For every dollar you give you will get $3.75 back) Scientific studies of the brain proves that the act of giving releases chemicals that make you feel good. Fellows questioned the extent of his claims and argued that he does not discuss the role of taxes as a contributor of social welfare such as common in most European countries.
After a short five minute break Burt Neuborne, a law professor of New York University, gave a passionate lecture on the American constitutional tradition. What followed was a two hour condensed law school education on American constitutional tradition. Neuborne said, "Add a little water to what I said and you can save three years of going to law school."
Dalton Conley concluded the day with a talk on "race, assets and the American dream." Conley highlighted major discrepancies between African American and whites in housing, assets, and education. He made an important distinction between wealth and income. Wealth of the parents is a predictor of education, unemployment rates, wealth of the children, while income is not a predictor at all. He stressed the importance of disadvantaged ethnic people becoming home owners which would contribute to their building of assets.
Nina, Diana and Ingmar
Monday, July 9th
Blog Posting, Monday July 9th
On the first day of the 2007 Humanity in Action American Program the fellows received an introduction to the organization from Judy Goldstein, after having been welcomed by Matt Hirshberg, our new Program Director. Besides advising the fellows to be cautious with the red lights and engage in a bit of investigative spying on New Yorkers and their dogs, Judy spoke about the nature of the different programs, the challenges facing Humanity in Action, as well as the upcoming plans for the establishment of HIA centres in Europe and the US respectively.
Following Judy, David Machacek spoke about the core of HIA by referring to Cass Sunstein’s article “The Thin Line”. He reflected on the natural inclination of human beings to obey authority, and posed the question “What happens when authority loses the moral compass”? David argued that what HIA sets out to do is to find young individuals with high moral thresholds, bring them together, and form a collective responsibility. In relation to the American Program, David pointed out 5 dimensions that are of particular importance in our dealings with diversity. 1. Immigration and Citizenship, 2. Race and Ethnicity, 3. Religion, 4. Economy and Law, and 5. Civil Society. He professed the hope that the fellows will leave the program not only more convinced of the moral values that we attain to, but also that they will have developed the capacity, the knowledge, and the network to react on time when authorities steer away from the moral compass, while holding each other accountable in this endeavour.
After getting to know each other on a more personal level through an introduction exercise the group watched the documentary “Four Hours at My Lai” and afterwards split into small discussion groups. Each group had to look into the psychological dynamics that caused different characters in the movie to react as they did. The aim was to identify which personal and situational mechanisms make a person a perpetrator, a bystander, or a “hero”.
We concluded with presentations by the French and Polish fellows. Alix, Halimatou, and Soraya presented an exposition of secularism in France. In the French context secularism is viewed as the primary means to ensure progress and freedom, while religion should be reserved for the private sphere. Asia, Jedrzej, and Pawel gave a presentation on the central role of religion in Poland, in this case meaning Catholicism, and its strong influence on Polish political affairs, both nationally and regionally.
The first day was productive and constructive, and holds great promises for the coming weeks.
Nailah & Julia
On the first day of the 2007 Humanity in Action American Program the fellows received an introduction to the organization from Judy Goldstein, after having been welcomed by Matt Hirshberg, our new Program Director. Besides advising the fellows to be cautious with the red lights and engage in a bit of investigative spying on New Yorkers and their dogs, Judy spoke about the nature of the different programs, the challenges facing Humanity in Action, as well as the upcoming plans for the establishment of HIA centres in Europe and the US respectively.
Following Judy, David Machacek spoke about the core of HIA by referring to Cass Sunstein’s article “The Thin Line”. He reflected on the natural inclination of human beings to obey authority, and posed the question “What happens when authority loses the moral compass”? David argued that what HIA sets out to do is to find young individuals with high moral thresholds, bring them together, and form a collective responsibility. In relation to the American Program, David pointed out 5 dimensions that are of particular importance in our dealings with diversity. 1. Immigration and Citizenship, 2. Race and Ethnicity, 3. Religion, 4. Economy and Law, and 5. Civil Society. He professed the hope that the fellows will leave the program not only more convinced of the moral values that we attain to, but also that they will have developed the capacity, the knowledge, and the network to react on time when authorities steer away from the moral compass, while holding each other accountable in this endeavour.
After getting to know each other on a more personal level through an introduction exercise the group watched the documentary “Four Hours at My Lai” and afterwards split into small discussion groups. Each group had to look into the psychological dynamics that caused different characters in the movie to react as they did. The aim was to identify which personal and situational mechanisms make a person a perpetrator, a bystander, or a “hero”.
We concluded with presentations by the French and Polish fellows. Alix, Halimatou, and Soraya presented an exposition of secularism in France. In the French context secularism is viewed as the primary means to ensure progress and freedom, while religion should be reserved for the private sphere. Asia, Jedrzej, and Pawel gave a presentation on the central role of religion in Poland, in this case meaning Catholicism, and its strong influence on Polish political affairs, both nationally and regionally.
The first day was productive and constructive, and holds great promises for the coming weeks.
Nailah & Julia
Friday, July 6, 2007
Welcome Fellows
Welcome to the Blog of Humanity in Action’s American Program 2007
The 2007 American Program staff wishes to launch this blog by extending a warm welcome to all of the fellows. We hope you have had a good journey to the Big Apple and are as excited as we are about the coming weeks. The program features a great list of scholars, professionals and organizations covering a wide selection of topics related to human and minority rights. We will address these issues in a challenging manner, which will stimulate constructive and thought-provoking discussions.
The pupose of this blog is to offer participating fellows, senior fellows as well as others interested in the American Program a forum to interact, reflect on and exchange experiences and thoughts concerning the program. Throughout the program the participating fellows will be responsible for posting reflections, pictures and impressions of the different days on the blog. The fellows have been divided into groups. Each group will be responsible for two postings. The fellows will receive information on the groups and posting dates shortly.
We invite those who are not participating to share their thoughts, comments and reactions on the postings freely. Through the postings and the interaction with you readers, we hope this blog will become the digital component of the American Program experience.
We are looking forward to embarking with you on what is sure to be an intellectually, emotionally and socially intensive journey. We hope you will embrace it fully and do your best to contribute to it.
Best wishes,
On behalf of the American Program Staff,
Nailah and Julia
The 2007 American Program staff wishes to launch this blog by extending a warm welcome to all of the fellows. We hope you have had a good journey to the Big Apple and are as excited as we are about the coming weeks. The program features a great list of scholars, professionals and organizations covering a wide selection of topics related to human and minority rights. We will address these issues in a challenging manner, which will stimulate constructive and thought-provoking discussions.
The pupose of this blog is to offer participating fellows, senior fellows as well as others interested in the American Program a forum to interact, reflect on and exchange experiences and thoughts concerning the program. Throughout the program the participating fellows will be responsible for posting reflections, pictures and impressions of the different days on the blog. The fellows have been divided into groups. Each group will be responsible for two postings. The fellows will receive information on the groups and posting dates shortly.
We invite those who are not participating to share their thoughts, comments and reactions on the postings freely. Through the postings and the interaction with you readers, we hope this blog will become the digital component of the American Program experience.
We are looking forward to embarking with you on what is sure to be an intellectually, emotionally and socially intensive journey. We hope you will embrace it fully and do your best to contribute to it.
Best wishes,
On behalf of the American Program Staff,
Nailah and Julia
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)